Hello,
Currently, I am running RTI Perftest to learn more about the effect of QoS policies on throughput and latency. I am interested to change the PRESENTATION QoS policy in the perftest_qos_profiles.xml file.
<publisher_qos>
<presentation>
<access_scope>TOPIC_PRESENTATION_QOS</access_scope>
<ordered_access>true</ordered_access>
</presentation>
</publisher_qos>
Hi,
I've been running some tests using RTI Perftest and have some questions regarding the architecture as well as some of the data.
I've been running these scripts:
Subscriber:
start cmd /k perftest_java.bat -dataLen 4096
start cmd /k perftest_java.bat -dataLen 4096
start cmd /k perftest_java.bat -dataLen 4096
start cmd /k perftest_java.bat -dataLen 4096
start cmd /k perftest_java.bat -dataLen 4096
Publisher:
Hello,
I am running RTI Connext 5.3.1 on a cluster of Beagle Black Bone (BBB) devices for a project. To benchmark the baseline maximum throughput for different data sample sizes, we used RTI DDS perftest 2.3.2. I had some questions about the observed performance results and I will be very grateful if you can help me in understanding the reason behind the observed results.
Dear Sir,
I am trying to execute latency and throughput examples from rti_workspace folder but Its giving me error. I am working with Java and using this command as per documentation. <NDDSHOME>/bin/rtiddsgen -language Java -example <your Java arch> -notypecode Latency.idl
hi,
I had worked with RTI PerfTest tool in the past and recently got the opportunity to extend the middleware agnositc test-harness that is provided by PerfTest tool, for testing other open-source messaging libraries like Zero-mq and Kafka.
Since these messaging libraries are not fully functional pub-sub middleware technologies, I had modified the harness to include synchronization between publishers & subscribers and to circumvent some thread-safety issues.
The license statement included in PerfTest code is as follows:
